Welcome to July, 2020

It's amazing how our society has been transformed in only a few months.

When the scourge of coronavirus hit toward the beginning of this year, many thought it would remain localized to China and other countries close to its origin. But by late February it became clear that we had a likely worldwide pandemic on our hands.

Luckily our leaders coordinated their efforts everywhere to limit the effects of a pandemic that could have killed millions as did the 1918 Flu Epidemic. Countries in Asia, Europe and the Western Hemisphere worked together early to prepare for what they knew would be the onslaught of a common enemy. They mobilized resources to plan for extensive testing, put extra hospital beds in place, and moved everyone into social isolation as soon as testing showed that the virus had reached their shores.

Thanks to the foresight of our leaders, who put personal politics aside to follow the recommendations of scientists working in coordination with the World Health Organization, this pandemic is largely behind us. Those who have been tested and have antibodies to the virus were allowed to venture out in early June. They now carry their post-virus visas and have begun to return to work, many in their previous occupations, many filling new job openings in public health created by the virus, many being trained in the new energy and infrastructure jobs created by government recovery funds. The rest of us slowly reentered a virus-free society on a tiered basis.

There is no returning to the economy – or world – of old. People now wash hands more frequently than in the past and many carry hand sanitizer. We avoid getting close to those who are not immediate family members, and we don't cough – or even breathe – in anyone’s direction. If any of us feel ill, we immediately return into semi-isolation to avoid infecting others. Expenses are covered for those who need it. The world is infused with a sense of community spirit not seen since the thirty-five year period following World War II.

We are told that a vaccination for the virus is expected soon due to the focus of world leaders working at record speed with labs around the world. The rest of this year will be a trial period to see if our new re-entry protocol works, but new infections have been very few over the last month.

We owe a debt of gratitude to our leaders who have put aside squabbling and grandstanding to literally save the world – and many lives – amidst the greatest threat to human civilization in over 100 years. Their efforts have set an example for what can be done when all countries and people devote themselves to a common cause. The main lesson that we have learned is not to return to partisan or international bickering.

We now see the value of combining efforts for the common good, and are determined to never again see our world torn apart as a result of an inability to work together.

Steve Zolno is the author of The Future of Democracy, The Death of Democracy, and the upcoming Truth and Democracy. He has been leading study groups in democracy since 2006.

Comments

pcwlincoln said…
Gee, it would have been nice if our own government responded that way.
April 22, 2020 at 4:28 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dobbs and Brown v. Board of Education: A Comparison

  As we mark the 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, I note that the supporters of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , the decision revoking the constitutional right to an abortion, have sought to draw celebratory parallels between that decision and Brown v. Board of Education. This was the case that recognized the principle that “separate but equal” treatment of Blacks and Whites in segregated schools was incompatible with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Like Brown , Dobbs overturned a foundational precedent that had been in force for decades, and according to anti-abortion proponents, established an important right – the right to fetal life -- denied by the discredited precedent. The Dobbs opinion itself referenced Brown a number of times, and Mitch McConnell said of the Dobbs decision: “The Court has corrected a terrible legal and moral error, like when Brown v. Board overruled Plessy v. Ferguson.”   But the differences between Brow...
Read more

Thoughts on Transgender Issues

   The treatment of transgender people is one of the most active fronts in our never-ending culture wars. Any nuance gets lost on both sides of the debate. At the risk of being caught in the cross-fire, this post attempts to formulate a sensible framework for understanding these issues.  My starting point is the affirmation of two principles. First, people should be able to express their gender identity as they wish, not in conformity with other people's ideas. That principle is rooted in the fundamental right to express oneself linked to the First Amendment protection of freedom of speech.  Second, gender dysphoria, the strong sense of belonging to a gender other than the biological gender into which one was born, is real. The causes of gender dysphoria are not well understood, but seems to have a physiological basis, at least in some  cases . From this emerges the principle that people experiencing gender dysphoria should be given “reasonable accommodation,” a...
Read more

The Supreme Court's Second Amendment Folly

  You may have seen this news item and thought it was some kind of joke. A Federal District Court in Texas, and then the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, ruled in   Rahimi v. United States , that a Texas law prohibiting people subject to domestic violence protective orders from owning guns was unconstitutional. Why? Because no such prohibition was recognized when the Second Amendment to the Constitution protecting the right to “keep and bear arms” was enacted back in 1789 or, in 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment applied federal constitutional rights to the states. After all, these were the bad ol’ days when there was no such thing as a domestic violence protective order. This court decision was the kind of absurd news item worthy of the Onion. But it was no joke. The explanation for this bit of judicial nonsense is to be found in the Supreme Court’s decision last term,  New York Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen . Back in 2008, on a 5-4 vote, the Court decided that t...
Read more