The Road to Fascism

Over the past 100 years there have been numerous revolutions and movements that have overthrown authoritarian regimes. Russia (1917) and China (1949) were among those that, despite their initial promise, reverted to a form of autocracy worse than before. Hitler and Mussolini, however, came into power by democratic means, then subverted their democracies to authoritarianism. There have been other countries that have overcome authoritarian regimes recently that initially moved in the direction of democracy, but many have succumbed to autocracy and seem to be heading toward actual fascism. They are deteriorating into what Steven Livitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, in their book How Democracies Die, describe as democracies that have gone very wrong:

Democracies may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders – presidents or prime ministers who subvert the very process that brought them to power. Some of these leaders dismantle democracy quickly, as Hitler did in the wake of the Reichstag fire in Germany. More often, though, democracies erode slowly, in barely visible steps.

Some of the countries that made up the Soviet Union are regressing past authoritarianism to fascism before our eyes. Russia, Poland, Hungary, the Philippines, Nicaragua, India, Turkey and others now tread in that direction. Here is the definition of fascism from Merriam Webster:

A political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

There were many in the U.S. and other democracies who visited and promoted Stalin and Hitler as they operated – at  first – under the guise of democracy, and became convinced that these leaders were on the side of “the people.” But “the people” in those cases – as in the countries cited above – are a majority of the population who buy into the view that their country is threatened by a dangerous minority.

This same conspiracy mentality, that there are internal enemies of the state who must be marginalized, was promoted by the last administration in the US, an idea still pushed by many in the Republican Party. This line also is being promoted by media outlets who glorify authoritarian attitudes and celebrate regimes where democracy is fading and minorities – or those who dare protest  – are blamed for society’s problems. This is the first step toward declaring that members of a minority are less than human, and already we can predict what the next step will be: marginalization, imprisonment, or perhaps worse, based purely on political, racial or religious identification.

A 2018 article in the New York Times (“As West Fears the Rise of Autocrats, Hungary Shows What’s Possible”), identifies the issue clearly in the case of Hungary:

Once praised by watchdog groups as a leading democracy of post-Soviet Eastern Europe, Hungary now is considered a democracy in sharp, worrisome decline. Through legislative fiat and force of will, Mr. Orban has transformed the country into a political greenhouse for an odd kind of soft autocracy, combining crony capitalism and far-right rhetoric with a single-party political culture.

As in all the countries mentioned above, Orban has threatened the press, forced businesses to take his side, and marginalized people of ethnic groups and religions considered not part of the national identity.

In addition to a former US president who pushed conspiracy theories that led his followers in the direction of fascism, a media that cares more about ratings than truth promotes leaders who have regressed into authoritarianism. Perhaps the most egregious recent example is the visit of Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to Hungary to provide coverage to the carefully crafted lies of its leader on US prime time television. This disgrace can be found at: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/08/tucker-carlson-viktor-orban-interview-fox-news-hungary-biden-interference.html

If we refuse to learn from the past by supporting governments that have spurned democracy enroute to fascism, we only have ourselves to blame for the deterioration of democracy around the world, and perhaps our own. This is one area of history we cannot afford to repeat.

How do we promote democracy over autocracy and fascism? By instilling genuine democratic ideals in our children that include the equality of every human being, by supporting media that promotes these values, by seeking the truth by examining evidence rather than blindly following an ideology or leader, and by voting for those who demonstrate a belief in real democratic values.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dobbs and Brown v. Board of Education: A Comparison

  As we mark the 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, I note that the supporters of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , the decision revoking the constitutional right to an abortion, have sought to draw celebratory parallels between that decision and Brown v. Board of Education. This was the case that recognized the principle that “separate but equal” treatment of Blacks and Whites in segregated schools was incompatible with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Like Brown , Dobbs overturned a foundational precedent that had been in force for decades, and according to anti-abortion proponents, established an important right – the right to fetal life -- denied by the discredited precedent. The Dobbs opinion itself referenced Brown a number of times, and Mitch McConnell said of the Dobbs decision: “The Court has corrected a terrible legal and moral error, like when Brown v. Board overruled Plessy v. Ferguson.”   But the differences between Brow...
Read more

Thoughts on Transgender Issues

   The treatment of transgender people is one of the most active fronts in our never-ending culture wars. Any nuance gets lost on both sides of the debate. At the risk of being caught in the cross-fire, this post attempts to formulate a sensible framework for understanding these issues.  My starting point is the affirmation of two principles. First, people should be able to express their gender identity as they wish, not in conformity with other people's ideas. That principle is rooted in the fundamental right to express oneself linked to the First Amendment protection of freedom of speech.  Second, gender dysphoria, the strong sense of belonging to a gender other than the biological gender into which one was born, is real. The causes of gender dysphoria are not well understood, but seems to have a physiological basis, at least in some  cases . From this emerges the principle that people experiencing gender dysphoria should be given “reasonable accommodation,” a...
Read more

The Supreme Court's Second Amendment Folly

  You may have seen this news item and thought it was some kind of joke. A Federal District Court in Texas, and then the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, ruled in   Rahimi v. United States , that a Texas law prohibiting people subject to domestic violence protective orders from owning guns was unconstitutional. Why? Because no such prohibition was recognized when the Second Amendment to the Constitution protecting the right to “keep and bear arms” was enacted back in 1789 or, in 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment applied federal constitutional rights to the states. After all, these were the bad ol’ days when there was no such thing as a domestic violence protective order. This court decision was the kind of absurd news item worthy of the Onion. But it was no joke. The explanation for this bit of judicial nonsense is to be found in the Supreme Court’s decision last term,  New York Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen . Back in 2008, on a 5-4 vote, the Court decided that t...
Read more